Berenz Law Network

Passion. Integrity. Trust.

  • Home
  • About
    • Areas We Serve
  • Practice Areas
    • Vehicle Accidents
    • Medical Injuries
    • Prescription & Pharmaceutical Errors
    • Premises & Product
    • Dog Bites
    • Catastrophic Injuries
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Accident Checklist
    • Videos
    • Car Accident FAQs
    • Dog Bite FAQs
    • Personal Injury FAQs
    • Results
    • Newsletter
  • Contact Us
+1-312-888-6058
phil@counseloroffices.net

Piercing Corporate Veils / Alter Ego – Business Litigation

April 20, 2015
Berenz Law Network

“Piercing a corporate veil” means an individual can be personally liable in certain situations. Courts apply this equitable remedy to avoid improper use of corporate laws meant to shield innocent shareholders and to promote justice.

HiddenAgenda(1)

The doctrine of piercing the corporate veil permits liability to be imposed on individuals for acts of a corporation when two conditions are satisfied: “(1) there is such a unity of interest and ownership that the separate personalities of the corporation and the parties who compose it no longer exist, and (2) circumstances are such that adherence to the fiction of a separate corporation would promote injustice or inequitable circumstances.”
Tower Investors, LLC v. 111 East Chestnut Consultants, Inc., 371 Ill. App. 3d 1019, 1033-34 (1st Dist. 2007).

A ​quite recent case in Illinois holds that the first “prong” calls for a multi-faceted analysis.

Among the factors courts look to are:

(1) inadequate capitalization; (2) failure to issue stock; (3) failure to observe corporate formalities; (4) nonpayment of dividends; (5) insolvency of the debtor corporation; (6) non-functioning of the other officers or directors; (7) absence of corporate records; (8) comingling of funds); (9) diversion of assets from the corporation by or to a stockholder or other person or entity to the detriment of creditors; (10) failure to maintain arm’s-length relationships among related entities; and (11) whether, in fact, the corporation is a mere façade for the operation of the dominant stockholders.

Buckley v. Abuzir, 2014 IL App (1st) 130469 ¶15. (Internal citations omitted).

Finally, Piercing the corporate veil requires “a substantial showing that one corporation is a dummy or sham for another.” Id. at ¶12, citing In re Estate of Wallen, 262 Ill. App. 3d 61, 68 (2nd Dist. 1994).

You can contact me here 24/7/365 (and I really mean that as I will answer my phone) if you have any questions about what claims/rights you may have after in relation to piercing a corporate veil and/or “alter ego” and to learn how I may be able to help you who may need, or simply want, a second opinion perhaps – in particular, you will find that I listen, take your phone calls and e-mails (and even text messages–BUT NOT WHILE DRIVING!!). I would be honored to help you with your matters – large or small.

The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts

Berenz Law Network

Chicago injury attorney Phil Berenz has secured substantial settlements and verdicts for clients in personal injury, medical malpractice, and wrongful death cases. He has also successfully defended businesses and individuals against lawsuits, winning judgments that far exceeded the amounts plaintiffs originally sought.

Latest posts by Berenz Law Network (see all)

  • After the Crash, Write It Down: Why an Injury Diary Helps - April 9, 2026

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Filed Under: Business Litigation, Contracts Interference, Illinois Sales Representative Act

Search

Social Media

Free Resource

Accident Checklist.
Click below to download now!

Download

Newsletter

Get no-fluff legal tips each month—real advice to help you protect your rights.
No spam, just straight talk from attorneys who get it.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Categories

  • Medication Errors
  • Law Blog
  • Nursing Home Care Act (NHCA)
  • Real Estate Law
  • Nursing Home Laws & Legislation
  • Bankruptcy Law
  • Nursing Home Staffing Issues
  • Rotator Cuff Tears
  • Sexual / Verbal / Physical Abuse
  • Dog Bite Injuries
  • Slips & Falls
  • Dog Injuries
  • Business Litigation
  • Elopement / Wandering
  • Contracts Interference
  • Automobile & Trucking Accidents
  • Illinois Sales Representative Act
  • False Claims Act – Whistleblower or "Qui Tam" Litigation
  • PERSONAL INJURY
  • Avandia – Heart Attack / Other Issues
  • Class Actions
  • Employment Discrimination and Related Issues
  • Product Liability
  • Medical Malpractice
  • NURSING HOME NEGLIGENCE & ABUSE
  • Paxil Birth Defects
  • Sepsis
  • Pharmaceutical Injuries
  • Bed Sores – Pressure Sores – Decubitus Ulcers
  • Workers Compensation
  • Bedrail Injuries
  • mesothelioma
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • After the Crash, Write It Down: Why an Injury Diary Helps
  • Why Telling an AI Chatbot About Your Accident Can Backfire
  • Should You Talk to an Insurance Adjuster After an Injury?
+1-312-888-6058
+1-312-375-6524
+1-312-275-7182
phil@counseloroffices.net
Berenz Law Network PC

33 North Dearborn Street, Suite 410
Chicago, Illinois 60602

Northshore Office By Appointment Only Please:

1363 Shermer Road, Suite 310
Northbrook, Illinois 60062

  • Free Resource
  • Newsletter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
© 2026 Berenz Law Network | All Rights Reserved
Legal Content Marketing and Design by
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d