$12.5 Million Dollar Verdict in Sexual Assault Case...

In California, a 94-year-old woman was awarded $12.5 Million by a jury for a sexual assault at a nursing home according to an article here.

The attorney for the assaulted woman alleged that the nursing home did not adequately staff the home, unsupervised employees and did not properly screen employees. 

Notably, the article claims:

Evidence at the trial showed that [the assailant] had submitted false IDs with multiple dates of birth, different pictures and different spellings of his name.

'Yet these people hired him and gave him a key to every patient's room,' [the attorney for the victim alleged.]

You must be extremely vigilant of your loved ones in these facilities. Review the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services listings of nursing homes here and check to see if your loved one is in a poor-performing facility and keep a vigilant eye on the care and treatment. If you believe your loved one has been abused or neglected, please do not hesitate to contact us for a confidential, free initial consultation on whether you should file a claim.

Sweeping Legislative Reform for Nursing Homes...

About a week ago, sweeping reform was passed by both houses in the Illinois Legislature which will help ensure better patient care and safety of some of the most vulnerable people in our society. Senate Bill 326 as originally introduced was to amend the Older Adult Services Act and in provisions concerning the development of a plan to restructure the State's service delivery system for older adults, provides that the Department on Aging and the Departments of Public Health and Healthcare and Family Services shall develop the plan no later than September 30, 2010. The bill was introduced to in order that such a plan shall protect the rights of all older Illinoisans to services based on their health circumstances and functioning level, regardless of whether they receive their care in their homes, in a community setting, or in a residential facility

According to one article found here and AARP Senior Manager for Advocacy, Nancy Nelson, "This legislation provides sweeping reforms that will radically improve the quality of care and safety for nursing home residents in Illinois[.]"

Among other improvements, the bill would require higher standards in admitting patients with serious mental illness and to segregate dangerous residents, increase staffing levels and ensuring stronger regulation, generally, of nursing homes.

You must be extremely vigilant of your loved ones in these facilities. Review the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services listings of nursing homes here and check to see if your loved one is in a poor-performing facility and keep a vigilant eye on the care and treatment. If you believe your loved one has been abused or neglected, please do not hesitate to contact us for a confidential, free initial consultation on whether you should file a claim.

Exposing the Greatest Corporate Malfeasance?

I am often questioned how the Toyota cases will "end up" in the Court system. No way to tell yet. At least for the class action cases. A recent article by The Wall Street Journal here, said a decision is expected in weeks as to the class action "venue" or where the cases could be consolidated and heard by attorneys vying for the "rights" to lead the charge. 

Ben Barnow of Chicago, an attorney I co-counseled with on another class action years ago, was one of those attorneys who spoke before the "panel" in pleading for jurisdiction of the cases. Most notably was a speech given at lunch time in a "prehearing litigation strategy conference" of the 100 or so attorneys vying for the coveted few minutes to speak at the hearing, as the article represented, represented, by a former Michael Jackson defense attorney, Michael Geragos:

'Everyone in this room is on the precipice of the opportunity to expose the greatest corporate malfeasance,' said Mr. Geragos. 'I would hope everyone in this room could coalesce and come together.'

We are filing individual suits in certain circumstances that may never become part of these class actions and are working with numerous individuals who have experienced sudden, unintended acceleration--and are honored to be able to speak for these traumatized (and some injured) individuals. If you believe you have been injured or suffered any property damage as a result of a potential gas pedal sticking, call us at 312.375.6524 to discuss your particular situation 24/7/365 and we'll determine if we can help.

Toyota Hid Damaging Information per Ex-Toyota Attorney...

In a breaking news story here on CNN, former in-house Toyota defense attorney, Dimitrios Biller, declares that he has some 6,000 internal Toyota documents that are "very damaging." According to the CNN article, Biller claims such documents were routinely withheld from Plaintiff's lawyers in product liability and negligence cases. 

Disturbingly, Biller says:

'There is a regular pattern and practice of not producing memos, minutes, reports, and e-mails,' [and] 'These documents can be used to establish liability against Toyota in product liability and negligence cases.'

One of our clients, Willette Green, reported her sudden, unintended acceleration to Toyota (and NHTSA) in the Fall of 2008 and Toyota denied any defect--a case involving the death of a panhandler who was run over when Willette's Lexus sped out of control. According to the CNN article, Toyota appears to have "Books of Knowledge" or "highly confidential information" related to such issues as sudden, unintended acceleration.

We are working with numerous individuals who have experienced sudden, unintended acceleration--and are honored to be able to speak for these traumatized (and some injured) individuals. If you believe you have been injured or suffered any property damage as a result of a potential gas pedal sticking, call us at 312.375.6524 to discuss your particular situation 24/7/365 and we'll determine if we can help.

2nd Lawsuit Filed Against Toyota...This Time A Death Involved...

 

Today, I filed the second lawsuit in Chicago, Illinois (Cook County Case No. 2010-L-002399) on behalf of Willette Green against Toyota alleging strict liability and negligence. This one involved the death of a pedestrian and injuries to Plaintiff after her 2006 Lexus ES 330 was unable to stop.

The lawsuit alleges:

On August 26, 2008, the Plaintiff was involved in an automobile accident at or near the intersection of 22nd Street and the feeder ramp from I-94 in Chicago, Illinois after her gas pedal—in the Lexus at issue and referenced herein—stuck and Plaintiff was unable to stop at the intersection, resulting in the death of a pedestrian, a crash with a third party, property damage and injuries to Plaintiff and others involved.

The lawsuit further alleges:

TOYOTA, by and through its agents, employees or representatives, was then and there guilty of one or more of the following careless negligent acts and/or omissions:

               

a.     carelessly and negligently designed, manufactured and sold the above-described Lexus;

b.     carelessly and negligently failed to institute and enforce a policy for review of the automobiles that it designs, manufactures and sells, including the aforestated Lexus, to insure that the Lexus and the vehicles are sold with adequate safeguards and controls; and

c.      was otherwise careless and negligent in the design, manufacture and sale of the above-described Lexus. 

The lawsuit further alleges:

The above-described Lexus was manufactured, sold and placed into the stream of commerce by the Defendant, TOYOTA, in an unsafe and defective condition and was unreasonably dangerous to its users by reason of, among others, the following defects in its design, manufacture, testing and/or marketing:

a.     in designing, manufacturing and providing the vehicle at issue of such construction that it could fail for multiple reasons, including its inability to stop or slow down, during normal foreseeable use;

b.     in failing to provide proper and clear warning of the dangers that the vehicle at issue might fail by not working as advertised and intended, causing injuries and damages to the Plaintiff;

c.      in failing to use available design and engineering skill or knowledge to produce a vehicle that would allow for proper operation;

d.     in failing to provide adequate operating instructions and warnings to Plaintiff who used the vehicle at issue even though the Defendant knew or should have known that such warnings were necessary for the safe use of the vehicle at issue;

e.     in failing to adequately inspect and test the vehicle at issue for safety prior to offering it for sale;

f.      in failing to discover that the vehicle at issue was dangerously defective, improperly designed and manufactured, inadequately tested and inspected, entirely unfit for duty and unsafe for use, constituting a hazard to Plaintiff; and/or

g.    in other respects to be proved at trial.

If you believe you have been injured or suffered any property damage as a result of a potential gas pedal sticking, call us at 312.375.6524 to discuss your particular situation 24/7/365 and we'll determine if we can help.

 

The Attorney That Answers His Own Phone...24/7/365

A colleague of mine, friend and great attorney in Wisconsin, Jonathan Groth, noted the signs of an attorney who listens and cares on his blog here when he said:

I just finished a jury trial in Milwaukee County. During the trial preparation my client and I were talking about how long we’ve known each other. I was the attorney that answered the phone when he called in the very first time soon after the collision. He didn’t talk with a paralegal, 'intake specialist' or secretary. I worked with him since, literally, day one.

Jon went on to note something that is absolutely paramount when choosing a lawyer: 

This kind of service is important to think about when you search/interview for your attorney. Hiring an attorney is a very personal matter. Availability (email, cell phone etc) and personality are extremely important to make sure your attorney will be with you for the long haul. By this I mean potentially to trial. Even though the vast majority of my clients’ cases settle before filing a lawsuit and before trial I think it helps them to know that their attorney will be willing and has the experience to fight at trial.

Like Jon Groth does in Wisconsin, I do in Illinois: you call, I answer the phone--24/7/365. Send an e-mail--you'll get a response. If I don't answer immediately, I either have 3 other calls coming in or am in front of a Judge or in a deposition and I guarantee you will receive a return call that day or evening. Your issues matter. Make sure your attorney answers his or her phone--and listens.

First Suit Against Toyota in Chicago and Illinois...

According to Robert Langendorf, one of the attorneys for Mr. Izenstark, and an attorney I am working with on Toyota cases, we believe we have filed the first suit against Toyota in Chicago and perhaps Illinois for the gas pedal problem. Mr. Langendorf was quoted in the front page of the Business Section of the Chicago Tribune on February 6, 2010 here

In addition, unique to this case is that we also sued Hertz for renting the vehicle to the Plaintiff when it 'knew, or should have known about dangerous issues with Toyotas or the Toyota recall or intended recall.' 

If you believe you have been injured or suffered any property damage as a result of a potential gas pedal sticking, call us at 312.375.6524 to discuss your particular situation 24/7/365 and we'll determine if we can help.

Suit Filed Against Toyota For Gas Pedal Sticking...

Today, we filed a lawsuit in Chicago, Illinois (Cook County Case No. 2010-L-001675) against Toyota and Hertz alleging strict liability and negligence. Hertz actually rented the 2010 Toyota Corolla long after Toyota noted potential problems with gas pedals in various models.

The lawsuit alleges:

TOYOTA, by and through its agents, employees or representatives, was then and there guilty of one or more of the following careless negligent acts and/or omissions:

a.      carelessly and negligently designed, manufactured and sold the above-described Corolla;

 

b.     carelessly and negligently failed to institute and enforce a policy for review of the automobiles that it designs, manufactures and sells, including the aforestated Corolla, to insure that the Corolla and the vehicles are sold with adequate safeguards and controls; and

 

c.      was otherwise careless and negligent in the design, manufacture and sale of the above-described Corolla.

The lawsuit further alleges:

The above-described Corolla was manufactured, sold and placed into the stream of commerce by the Defendant, TOYOTA, in an unsafe and defective condition and was unreasonably dangerous to its users by reason of, among others, the following defects in its design, manufacture, testing and/or marketing:

a.     in designing, manufacturing and providing the vehicle at issue of such construction that it could fail for multiple reasons, including its inability to stop or slow down, during normal foreseeable use;

 

b.     in failing to provide proper and clear warning of the dangers that the vehicle at issue might fail by not working as advertised and intended, causing injuries and damages to the Plaintiff;

 

c.      in failing to use available design and engineering skill or knowledge to produce a vehicle that would allow for proper operation;

 

d.     in failing to provide adequate operating instructions and warnings to Plaintiff who used the vehicle at issue even though the Defendant knew or should have known that such warnings were necessary for the safe use of the vehicle at issue;

 

e.     in failing to adequately inspect and test the vehicle at issue for safety prior to offering it for sale;

 

f.      in failing to discover that the vehicle at issue was dangerously defective, improperly designed and manufactured, inadequately tested and inspected, entirely unfit for duty and unsafe for use, constituting a hazard to Plaintiff; and/or

 

g.    in other respects to be proved at trial.

The lawsuit further alleges:

HERTZ, by and through its agents, employees or representatives, was then and there guilty of one or more of the following careless negligent acts and/or omissions:

a.      carelessly and negligently rented, cared, maintained and serviced the above-described Corolla;

 

b.     carelessly and negligently failed to institute and enforce a policy for review of the automobiles that it rents, including the aforestated Corolla, to insure that the vehicles are rented with adequate safeguards and controls or that such vehicles, including the Corolla at issue, is safe to entrust to its customers;

 

c.      carelessly and negligently made the vehicle available for rent knowing, or in a situation where it should have known, of problems with the Corolla at issue or the Toyota recall or future, intended recall; and

 

d.     was otherwise careless and negligent in the rental, care, maintenance and service of the above-described Corolla. 

If you believe you have been injured or suffered any property damage as a result of a potential gas pedal sticking, call us at 312.375.6524 to discuss your particular situation 24/7/365 and we'll determine if we can help.

 

Toyota Gas Pedals Admittedly Sticking...

According to a Toyota press release, Toyota intends to recall 2.3 million vehicles to fix accelerator or gas pedals. Toyota claims its engineers "have developed and rigorously tested a solution that involves reinforcing the pedal assembly in a manner that eliminates the excess friction that has caused the pedals to stick in rare instances." 

Jim Lentz, Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.'s President and Chief Operating Officer, has stated:

We know what’s causing the sticking accelerator pedals, and we know what we have to do to fix it. 

Per Toyota, vehicles affected by the recall include:

• Certain 2009-2010 RAV

• Certain 2009-2010 Corolla

• 2009-2010 Matrix

• 2005-2010 Avalon

• Certain 2007-2010 Camry

• Certain 2010 Highlander

• 2007-2010 Tundra

• 2008-2010 Sequoia 

If you believe you have been injured or suffered any property damage as a result of a potential gas pedal sticking, call us at 312.375.6524 to discuss your particular situation 24/7/365 and we'll determine if we can help.

Nursing Homes Investigated by Authorities

According to an article published January 23, 2010 here, authorities in both Illinois and Indiana are investigating numerous nursing homes for patient safety problems. According to the article, an Indiana nursing home named Northlake Nursing and Rehabilitation Center run by a for-profit company may avoid likely closure. The primary investor of the nursing home is nursing home operator Eric Rothner and

Many of Rothner's nursing homes have suffered quality and patient safety problems and have been investigated by authorities in Indiana and Illinois.

Also according to the article, Northlake was "red-flagged" for a "Special Focus Facility watchlist by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. . . and it was noted that the "home is ranked by state and federal agencies as among the worst in the state."

Review the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services listings of nursing homes here and check to see if your loved one is in one of these poor-performing facilities and keep a vigilant eye on the care and treatment. If you believe your loved one has been abused or neglected, please do not hesitate to contact us for a confidential, free initial consultation on whether you should file a claim.

Insurance Company? Witnesses? Should You Talk to them?

After an auto or other accident (auto, malpractice, slip and fall--or any incident such as a breach of contract, sexual harassment incident, assault and battery, nursing home negligence and abuse or any incident you can possibly imagine), insurance companies will most likely be the first to contact you. Next, will be other individuals or entities--all trying to investigate and obtain information to build a defense against any potential claim you may have.

Whether you should talk to the insurance company (or any other person or entity) is basically a judgment call on your part; however, you should simply consult with an attorney first and ask the insurance company or other investigator that your attorney be present on a teleconference call to protect your rights. You generally have a duty to cooperate with your own insurance company under your policy.

And if another party's insurance company contacts you, a witness or other investigator, you are generally not required to talk to at all--and should not without an attorney present. A third party's insurance company or other investigator will most likely take down notes, or worse, record the conversation and then try to build a defense in your case or use every single word you say against you 6 months, 1 year, 2 years later in your case. In addition, defendant's insurance companies will try to "push" low settlement offers--sometimes $500.00 or $1,000.00 when your medical bills could quickly escalate over those amounts after an accident.

As for witnesses or other investigators, you should absolutely consult with an attorney first. The attorney should be involved to take a witness statement if possible for preservation of thoughts and observations while they are fresh in everyone's minds. Again, such statements can greatly impact your case and you should get all contact information from a witness immediately at the scene of an accident--the more telephone numbers, the better!

If you are unsure of who to speak with, simply pick up the phone and call us at 312-375-6524 (24/7/365--and we really mean that!) for two minutes. We can help and those two minutes could impact your case significantly

In 2010: Texting / E-Mail Will Now Get You a Ticket! Just Don't Do It!

Effective January 1, 2010, using your mobile device can get you a ticket, but worse, they cause accidents which sometimes cause injuries to you and others for life. Bottom line, wait to use your mobile device, focus on the road and be respectful of others around you--especially while doing 65 m.p.h. down the highway. Mobile devices are shown to cause distractions and having handled numerous auto accidents, our firm learns that Defendants were often using mobile devices just before an accident and our clients pay dearly with life-altering injuries.

Illinois House Bills 71 and 72 were signed in August of 2009 by Governor Pat Quinn and according to a summary of the laws on the State of Illinois web site here

The new laws ban motorists from sending text messages while driving in Illinois, and make it illegal to talk on a cell phone while driving through a highway construction zone or school zone.  In addition, it will become illegal to compose, send or read text messages, instant messages and e-mail on a cell phone or surf the internet while driving.  The ban also includes personal digital assistants and portable or mobile computers, but does not include global positioning systems (GPS) or navigation systems.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates, driver distraction from all sources contributes to 25 percent of all police-reported traffic crashes. If you have a youth driver in the home, take 5 minutes and explain the ramifications of using a mobile device while driving. Plead with them to wait a few minutes before using their mobile devices. And even adults need to put the devices down, keep their eyes on the road and help make the roads a safer place for all.

If you are in an automobile accident and you believe the person who hit you was using a mobile device, pointedly ask the person (if you can have a civil conversation with him or her) if they were using a cell phone or texting when they hit you. If they admit it, tell the police officer that comes to the scene to at least make a note of it in the police report even if the police do not issue a ticket and ask the police officer to confirm the conversation. Contact us 24/7/365 (and we really mean that as wewill answer our phone) if you have any questions about how such an accident could affect your claim against that driver. 

PASSION - INTEGRITY - TRUST - RESULTS

PASSION - INTEGRITY - TRUST - RESULTS

Taking a personal injury matter where a man, a woman or a child has been injured (slightly or significantly) requires, first and foremost, passion and empathy. If a lawyer cannot truly understand the suffering (again, small or significant) that another human being is enduring, the lawyer cannot demonstrate or exhibit to every person, insurance company and, ultimately, the jury how that suffering has affected a person's life.

The same holds true when a person or company is cheated out of money. When money owed is not paid. When a person or a company is wrongfully sued and must be zealously defended. Money cheated, money owed and wrongful or frivolous lawsuits cause suffering in a person's life as well. People can't sleep at night. People worry. They cannot focus on their jobs, their family, life in general. People lose their homes because bills aren't getting paid. Credit is ruined. Family arguments erupt.

A person's life in personal injury situations is even more dramatically affected when even a hurt back or a hurt neck makes it next to impossible to sit at a desk all day long at work or perform manual labor--whichever life calling a person follows. Sometimes "calling off" from the pain results in a lost job and a downward spiral of a lost home, lost relationships, lost life. The things you used to enjoy you can enjoy no longer. It wasn't your fault.

Your lawyer needs to truly understand all of these aspects of how a personal injury matter or business dispute has affected your life. Aggressive and zealous representation and empathy are an absolute must. An attentive ear--listening to you--is the only way a lawyer can fully comprehend the situation. Phil Berenz listens.

Integrity is doing the "right thing when nobody is looking." Your lawyer must handle every aspect, every conversation of your matter with the utmost integrity-when you are not on the phone and when you are not present. Trust must be unequivocally paramount.

And, finally, while a lawyer can never guarantee a particular outcome in any matter, the passion, integrity and trust will usually (not always) end in positive, productive results.

More Ignorance of Reports of Abuse?

A recent report questions whether employee reports of patient abuse in a nursing home went ignored. Read the full article here. An individual was indicted last month on four counts of aggravated sexual abuse of nursing home patients.

Two employees of the nursing home reported the abuse to their supervisor and the Board of Nursing is now investigating whether the reports went unanswered.

Monitor your loved ones closely. If you notice any bruising, withdrawal, a lack of willingness to communicate with you or unusual behavior, report the issue to the administrator of the nursing home but a call to the local police department may be in order as well. Take action. Call us to determine if a civil lawsuit should be filed.

Cameras in Nursing Homes to Protect the Elderly?

A recent article notes that a top state prosecutor is supporting the placement of cameras in nursing homes residents' rooms to protect them. Read the full article here. While residents would obviously have the right to object for privacy matters, the idea seems like one that would add another level of security to our most vulnerable segment in society. The article also notes from Wes Bledsoe, founder of "A Perfect Cause" whose mission is "TO END NEEDLESS SUFFERING AND PREVENTABLE DEATHS, WHILE PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS FROM CORPORATE GREED AND NEGLIGENCE" (visit www.aperfectcause.org), the following profound statement:

The system is broken beyond all belie[f]. Your loved ones are suffering as a result ...

Bledsoe's grandmother died on her 86th birthday in 2000 as a result of the negligent care she received at an Oklahoma City nursing home and hence his founding of A Perfect Cause. The fight must continue against such negligence. If you feel your loved one has needlessly suffered as a result of nursing home abuse or neglect, contact us immediately to review the situation. We usually work on a contingent basis if we believe you have a claim--that is, if there is no recovery, there is no attorney fee due.

Another Bill To Try to Cap Damages in Nursing Home Cases...

Yet another bill has been introduced to try to cap non-economic and punitive damages when nursing home residents and their families attempt to hold nursing homes accountable for abuse and neglect. Read the full article here. The article reiterates what the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid has found in the quality of care in this nation's nursing homes and summarizes the outrage that should be present over such a bill:

Clearly, there are some serious deficiencies in the quality of care offered by some of our nursing homes that need to be addressed. Why, then, would we want to severely limit one of the only means of recourse for families who find that their loved ones have been neglected and/or abused? That's what this legislation would do. It would make it harder for nursing homes to be held accountable for abuse or neglect.

The only means to make a nursing home accountable is to make them pay for their mistakes so that, in the future, maybe they won't make the same mistake twice if they know it will continually cost them. It is the only incentive to ensure your loved ones are properly cared for--every day. Without the threat of punitive damages, in particular, nursing home management will calculate the risk of reducing staff to lower levels, keeping records and doctor's orders with less caution and having an attitude of "this is just a business" even more. Make sure such bills do not become law. Call your State Representatives to oppose any such measures. Anything else will only contribute to the notion that the value of the lives of the elderly--and others who must live in nursing homes--are worthless. In this great country, we simply cannot allow that to happen. 

Man Charged with Abusing Nursing Home Residents...

 A man has been charged with abusing nursing home residents. Three patients were videotaped on the abuser's cell phone and had been seen by several witnesses before they were erased. Read the full article here. The saddest part of this situation is that most residents are not in a condition to even report such abuse due to dementia and other similar situations. In fact, it took the wife of one resident to complain to police and according to a court affidavit:

the elderly male victim repeatedly complained that Pearl stripped off his clothes and touched him inappropriately, spit in his face and threatened to hurt him

The victim has trouble sleeping now and can't even calm down. Nursing home residents are guaranteed certain rights in their care but family members must monitor the care and condition of their loved ones to assist in preventing these situations. If you believe a loved one has been abused or neglected, contact us immediately to protect their rights.

Doc, Nurse and Pharmacist Drugged Residents...

A doctor, a nurse and a pharmacist have been criminally charged in connection with drugging some 22 nursing home residents with psychotropic medications simply to make them more tranquil. Read the article here. The article notes that 3 people may have died and one suffered great injury as a result. The attorney general noted:

'These people maliciously violated the trust of their patients, by holding them down and forcibly administering psychotropic medications if they dared to question their care" . . . 'This is appalling behavior, which amounts to assault with a deadly weapon.'

Laws protect nursing home residents from abuse and neglect; however, the only way to determine if such is even happening is to communicate often with your loved ones. Ask questions. Ask their neighbors questions. Ask the staff how your loved one is. Review their medical records and nurses notes when you can to determine if they are receiving the care, medications and attention required. If not--get them out of the home!

Nursing Home Sued Over Resident Freezing to Death...

An Itasca-area nursing home called The Arbor of Itasca has been sued after an 89-year-old woman, who suffered from dementia, was found frozen to death in the nursing home courtyard. Read the full article here. According to the coroner, the woman was outside for at least 90 minutes. Her family noted that she wasn't even able to leave her bed without assistance and doesn't understand how staff allowed her to slip out unnoticed. Striking to the very heart of the matter, one of the woman's daughters stated simply:

This just can't be allowed to happen to anybody. Nobody should have to die like that.

Under the Illinois Nursing Home Care Act, a facility cannot abuse or neglect a resident. See 210 ILCS 45/2-107. "Neglect" means a failure in a facility to provide adequate medical or personal care or maintenance, which failure results in physical or mental injury to a resident or in the deterioration of a resident's physical or mental condition. See 210 ILCS 45/1-117. "Abuse" means any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted on a resident other than that by accidental means in a facility. See 210 ILCS 45/1-103. Violation of the act can result in damages, including attorney's fees, being awarded. See 210 ILCS 45/3-602. Know the facility that you check your loved ones into and investigate, investigate, investigate before entrusting your family members to any facility.

1 Star for Illinois Nursing Home...

A recent article pointed out life inside one of Illinois' "one-star" nursing homes. Notably, when inspectors arrived they found:

The lobby smelled of urine. In one room, they found a 97-year-old woman, lying in her own waste. She had severe bruises on her arm, foot and both legs that the staff could not immediately explain. Another resident had a bed sore larger than a golf ball and dripping blood.

It was also noted that an obese man suffocated after getting stuck between a mattress and side rails and the State of Illinois fined the facility $50,000 for the death--noted as one of of the largest nursing home penalties in the state last year.

In my earlier posts, I stress often that when placing a loved one in any nursing facility, do your due diligence. Check the ratings system. Check the Illinois Department of Public Health. Ask questions of the staff and visit the facility at various times. There is no reason that any resident should ever suffer through these issues.
 

Nursing Home Sued After Man Dies of Thirst...

The son of a man who died from thirst in a nursing home has filed a lawsuit against the nursing home. Read the full article here. According to an investigation by the Department of Health, staff noticed the man undergo weight loss but didn't notify doctors. The Department of Health found the nursing home be in neglect. When sending loved ones to nursing homes, investigate the nursing homes for past instances of neglect. Check the new Medicare site for ratings here, the local state department that regulates nursing homes (in Illinois here) and ask many, many questions of the staff and administration before admitting a loved one.

New Rating System for Nursing Homes Unveiled...

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") has just launched "Nursing Home Compare" which provides quality ratings for each of the nation’s 16,000 Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified nursing homes. The rating system is a five-star system based on health inspection results, quality measures, and staffing levels and an overall rating is also provided. Visit the rating system here. CMS suggests using these ratings along with other information to get a true picture about any particular nursing home. 

The nursing home industry may be concerned about the system. According to one article, the rating results are as follows:

About 22 percent of the nation's nearly 16,000 nursing homes received the federal government's lowest rating in a new five-star system unveiled Thursday, while 12 percent received the highest ranking possible.

792 nursing homes in Illinois have been rated here. Families should take into account this information before sending a loved one to any Illinois facility but also review other sources of information to determine the level of care and attention loved ones should receive.

Nurse Jailed in Neglect of Nursing Home Resident...

A former nursing home director was sentenced to 19 months in prison and 3 years of probation for neglecting a 60-year-old woman. For the full article, click here. According to the article, the resident was in agony for 5 days before staff called an ambulance. Apparently, aides had dropped the resident while moving her into her bed. Unbelievably, the nurse waited 5 days before ordering X-rays:

despite multiple reports from different staffers that [the resident] was screaming or crying in pain.

The resident died after surgery. The family filed a $3.5 Million dollar civil lawsuit which has tentatively and confidentailly settled.

CNA indicted for abuse of nursing home resident...

A certified nursing assistant has been indicted for felony abuse of a nursing home resident in Jackson, Mississippi and was arrested Monday, December 8, 2008. For the full article, click here. According to the article, the attorney general noted that:

she struck the patient -- an elderly woman -- in the eye, causing pain and suffering...

Residents have rights to be free from such abuse and neglect. If your loved ones have suffered any such abuse or neglect, contact an attorney immediately.

New Illinois Law to Notify Coroners in a Nursing Home Death?

Some Illinois County coroners would like to see a new law requiring nursing homes to report every death for investigation into potential abuse or neglect. For the full article, click here. According to the article, the Illinois State Department of Public Health conducted a pilot project in 10 Illinois counties over the course of a year to determine whether a policy to investigate nursing home deaths by a coroner should be applied to all 102 counties in the State. However, the study has not resulted in any anticipated lobbying for new legislation. Notably though the study showed:

an 11 percent increase in nursing-home complaints filed with the state by coroners and all other sources.

Some counties have noted that such a law would require more funding, including Cook County, in which Chicago is located. The article pointed out that in large counties such as Cook, coroners and medical examiners look into nursing home deaths only after they receive complaints from family members or if criminal activity is suspected. This is where Plaintiff's lawyers step in--if nobody else has the funding or energy or responsibility for uncovering the truth of how nursing home residents are treated, a lawyer will.

Critical Shortage of Care Providers in Nursing Homes...

A recent article notes a critical shortage in nurses and nurse's aides in nursing homes. For the full article click here. The article notes that at a time when the population is aging and more people are entering nursing homes, care is short. According to the article, an American Health Care Association survey released just last month noted alarming statistics:

26 percent, or more than a quarter, of registered nurse positions in nursing homes were vacant on June 30, 2007. The survey found that 13.7 percent of certified nurses' aides slots -- about one in seven -- also were empty on that day. The national vacancy rate for nurses was 16.3 percent and for nurses' aides, 9.5 percent.

Your loved ones deserve proper care. Ask questions of the nursing home about the ratio of nurses to residents and nurse's aides. Ask about turnover. Ask about the shifts of the nurses and who is on duty and when. Residents are afforded many rights under the law--proper care is one of them.

Teens criminally charged with abusing nursing home residents...

Two teenagers working at a nursing home were recently charged with abusing residents in a Minnesota nursing home and four others for failing to report the incidents. They were charged with poking, taunting and groping vulnerable residents according to the article in the Grand Forks Herald. Sadly, it was noted:

The Minnesota Department of Health released a report in August showing that 15 residents with Alzheimer's disease or other dementia disorders were abused at the facility between Jan. 1 and May 1.

Your loved ones deserve respect and dignity where they are living out the remainder of their lives. Interrogate staff and the nursing home management about the people who will be caring for your loved ones.

Nursing Home Abuse Recorded on Secret Video...

Desperate to learn the truth, the family of an 84-year-old resident of a Kentucky nursing home hid a video camera in the resident's room after discovering dozens of bruises all over her body and not receiving satisfactory answers from the staff. Read the full article here.

The videotape captured the staff "pulling the resident out of bed by her wrists and neck," and "roughly moving the resident from side to side," the investigation showed.

Family should consult with a lawyer before attempting a similar situation--placing a video camera in a nursing home. However, demanding staff answer questions about noticeable bruises, injuries and cleanliness is appropriate--and a demand that an independent doctor immediately evaluate your loved one is also in order under such circumstances. Residents have rights to proper care and treatment. Ensure your loved ones are being properly cared for.

Children's Products Get Lead Limit by New Federal Law...

The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA) was signed into law on August 14, 2008. The CPSIA establishes consumer product safety standards and other safety requirements for children's products and "reauthorizes" and "modernizes" the Consumer Product Safety Commission. It is a very strong law involving harsh civil and criminal penalties for those who violate it. Read all about the Act here.

One important aspect of the Act lowers the amount of lead that can be in children’s products. The limits will be phased in over the course of three years. By February 10, 2009, products designed or intended primarily for children 12 and younger may not contain more than 600 ppm of lead. Children’s products that contain more lead than 600 ppm are banned in the U.S. after February 10, 2009, and the sale of those products can result in significant civil and criminal liability. After 1 year from enactment, or August 14, 2009, products designed or intended primarily for children 12 and younger cannot contain more than 300 ppm of lead. The limit goes down to 100 ppm after three years, or August 14, 2011, unless the Commission determines that it is not technologically feasible to have this lower limit.

Another important aspect of the Act is that it requires third-party testing of children's products. Class actions against manufacturers of products that violate the Act may be warranted as compliance fails.

Illinois State Police Speed Policy Change in Response to Deaths

The Illinois State Police is instituting a new speed policy that calls for a "four tier response code system" beginning January 1, 2009. Read the facts of the new policy here. After two sisters were killed when an Illinois State Police Trooper's squad car crossed an I-64 median last November, Illinois State Police felt it was time to institute a policy to prevent future tragedies. Notably, this is only the second state in the nation to implement such speed policies and as the Illinois State Police points out:

The policy will institute a four-tier response code system for officers responding to calls for service. This policy will outline the use of emergency equipment and the speed and manner in which the officer will respond to a call, including supervisory notification when the responding officer intends to exceed the posted speed limit more than 20 mph. Supervisors will also be required to monitor the incident as it evolves and make appropriate changes in their officers’ response code as necessary. 

Pursuing another vehicle "at all costs" is simply unacceptable. Hopefully, this policy will prevent future tragedies.

Holiday Season: Take Note of the Care Provided to Your Loved Ones...

As one recent article points out, the holiday season is the time of year nursing home residents receive the most visits and loved ones should take careful note of any signs of abuse or neglect--especially bed sores. Bed sores are preventable, are not normal, and command immediate attention. If your loved one seems "distant" or has any bruising, scars, cuts or appears unbathed and dirty, take immediate action, ask questions and demand answers. Ask them how the staff has been treating them, if they have suffered any falls--even if they feel the falls may be their own fault--if they are receiving their medicine (and on time and at the right "intervals") and simply if they are happy. The law grants nursing home residents certain rights--particularly rights commanding proper care, free from abuse and neglect.

Another nursing home fined for more than 2 dozen violations...

An Arizona nursing home was found with more than two dozen violations and has agreed to pay the State $17,500 in civil penalties as a result notes the Arizona Daily Star. According to the article, among the violations noted, including a failure to protect its elderly residents from sexual abuse, state inspectors found that the home also failed to timely note that a resident suffered a seizure, fell and was unconscious--and was later found to have suffered intracranial bleeding from the fall. In addition, another resident who fell was merely given Tylenol for ankle pain when, in fact, after nearly a week, the center determined that she had actually fractured her ankle. Residents of nursing homes have rights to receive proper care. A simple phone call to a resident's primary care provider would prevent needless suffering. Make sure your loved ones are getting the attention they deserve--and with dignity and respect.

Gruesome Photographs: Admissible at Trial?

At trial time, Defendants may make a motion before the Court to exclude gruesome photographs of injuries. However, simply because the photograph(s) may be gruesome and possibly cause prejudice in the minds of the jury is no reason to exclude the photograph(s). See e.g. Burnett v. Caho, 7 Ill.App.3d 266, 272 (3rd Dist. 1972). Admissibility is within the discretion of the trial judge and it is common practice to display personal injuries to the jury "even though there is no controversy as to the existence, nature and extent thereof." See id. For example, it has even been held to include the right to show an injured eyeball that has been removed and it is not error to permit the plaintiff to display his injuries to the jury and to testify briefly while so doing. See id.

Generally speaking, such exhibits are admissible if the probative value of the exhibits is not outweighed by their inflammatory effect. See Drews v. Gobel Freight Lines, Inc., 144 Ill.2d 84, 99 (Ill. 1991). In Drews, the plaintiff introduced photographs of a decedent taken at a morgue to support Plaintiff's claim for decedent's pain and suffering. One of the photographs even showed multiple lacerations to the decedent's face and throat, and the other photograph showed a gaping wound and burns to a knee. Similar to the Burnett case, the Illinois Supreme Court in Drews held that in spite of the fact that a photo may be gruesome or inflammatory, the trial judge may admit it for the probative value in assisting the jury's determination of the extent of pain and suffering. See id.

Winning a Jury Trial: Keep it Simple...

In a well-written article by the New Jersey Lawyer, the old saying rings true: If you want to win over the jury, keep it simple. Jurors don't want to hear long dissertations on the law with "high-brow" words and fancy legal terms; jurors want to hear plain, everyday language--and in short statements or arguments. One attorney in the article summed it up perfectly:

Talk to the least-educated, dumbest juror you have. If he gets what you're saying, everybody else will too.

It is also noted in this article that the lawyer's task during trial can be summed up in seven words:

"Say it."

"Prove it."

"Say it again."

Tell the jury your client's story. Make it simple. Prove that story and sum it up in closing. Most importantly, keep it as short as possible to keep the jury's attention.

The Person Who Hit Me Received a Ticket! Won't the Jury Hear About That?!

Many individuals who are in accidents often ask me whether the jury will hear that the defendant received a ticket in relation to the accident. They would love for the jury to hear that! They are often surprised to hear me say "absolutely not." In fact, I tell them that the Judge--prior to the trial even beginning--makes decisions on whether such issues will ever be heard by the jury. These decisions by the Judge are based on what are known as "Motions in Limine." Motions in Limine are specific requests brought by both parties to prevent the mention of, question of, reference to, inquiry of, suggestion of--directly or indirectly--certain evidentiary issues. The rationale for excluding certain issues such as traffic tickets is, among other reasons, to prevent unfair prejudice to a party. Defendants routinely demand that evidence of traffic tickets be excluded from admissibility before the jury unless, generally speaking, a proper foundation is made as to a defendant pleading guilty (as opposed to being found guilty) and a certified copy of the guilty plea being made available at trial time. Even then, there is no guarantee a Judge will allow a guilty plea to a traffic ticket to be heard by the jury depending upon the specific circumstances of the situation. If the Judge rules that no evidence of traffic tickets will be admissible and a plaintiff (or his attorney or potentially other witnesses) mentions the ticket, the defendant's attorney will most likely move for an immediate mistrial!